По-моему тут действительно всё ясно.

Понимание ЛВГ полегоньку продвигается

Кстати, господа, а где празднества по поводу 10 000 - го поста волногого генома ? Я в nature не догоняю

Осталось только оформить заявку на номинацию на премию.

Кстати, господа, а где празднества по поводу 10 000 - го поста волногого генома ? Я в nature не догоняю

огого!

Поздравления от Администрации

Понимание ЛВГ полегоньку продвигается.

Schrodinger’s cat versus Darwin
Z. K. Silagadze
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics and
Novosibirsk State University, 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia
Abstract
Sun Wu-k’ung, an immortal Monkey-King of Chaos learns modern physics from
the Patriarch Bodhi and questions the Darwinian evolution. He finds that the modern
physics indicates towards the intelligent design as a vastly more probably origin of
humans than the random evolution by mutations and natural selection.

MORPHIC COMPUTING: MORPHIC SYSTEMS AND MORPHIC SYSTEM
OF SYSTEMS (M-SOS)
MASOUD NIKRAVESH 1, GERMANO RESCONI 2
Abstract. Morphic Computing is based on Field Theory [14-16] and more specically Morphic
Fields. Morphic Fields were rst introduced by [18] from his hypothesis of formative causation
that made use of the older notion of Morphogenetic Fields. [18] developed his famous theory,
Morphic Resonance, on the basis of the work by French philosopher Henri Bergson. Morphic
Computing- is based on Field Theory and more specically Morphic Fields. Morphic Computing
is a natural extension of Holographic Computation, Quantum Computation, Soft Computing,
and DNA Computing. In this paper, we introduce Morphic Systems and Morphic System of
Systems (M-SOS).
Keywords: Morphic Computing, Morphogenetic Computing, Morphic Fields; Morphogenetic
Fields, Quantum Computing, DNA Computing, Soft Computing, Computing with Words, Mor-
phic Systems, Morphic Network, Morphic System of Systems.

Шелдрейка, но эта работа пожалуй первая на которую можно опираться

Morphic computing

Germano Resconia, and Masoud Nikravesh

In this paper, we introduce a new type of computation called “morphic computing”. Morphic computing is based on field theory and more specifically morphic fields. Morphic fields were first introduced by Rupert Sheldrake [R. Sheldrake, A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance (second edition, 1985), Park Street Press; Reprint edition (March 1, 1995), 1981] from his hypothesis of formative causation that made use of the older notion of morphogenetic fields. Rupert Sheldrake [R. Sheldrake, A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance (second edition, 1985), Park Street Press; Reprint edition (March 1, 1995), 1981] developed his famous theory, morphic resonance, on the basis of the work by French philosopher Henri Bergson. Morphic fields and its subset morphogenetic fields have been at the center of controversy for many years in mainstream science and the hypothesis is not accepted by some scientists who consider it a pseudoscience. We claim that morphic computing is a natural extension of holographic computation, quantum computation, soft computing, and DNA computing. All natural computations bonded by the turing machine can be formalised and extended by our new type of computation model—morphic computing. In this paper, we introduce the basis for this new computing paradigm and its extensions such as quantum logic and entanglement in morphic computing, morphic systems and morphic system of systems (M-SOS). Its applications to the field of computation by words as an example of the morphic computing, morphogenetic fields in neural network and morphic computing, morphic fields - concepts and web search, and agents and fuzzy in morphic computing will also be discussed.

Morphic Computing: Quantum and Fields

Germano Resconi and Masoud Nikravesh

Abstract
Morphic Computing was first introduced by Resconi and Nikravesh [2006, 2007a, and 2007b] which makes use of Morphic and Morphogenetic Fields. Morphic Fields and its subset Morphogenetic Fields have been at the center of controversy for many years in mainstream science and the hypothesis is not accepted by some scientists who consider it a pseudoscience. Resconi and Nikravesh [2006, 2007a, and 2007b] claim that Morphic Computing is a natural extension of Holographic Computation, Quantum Computation, Soft Computing, and DNA Computing. In this paper, we introduce extensions of the Morphic Computing such as Quantum Logic and Entanglement in Morphic Computing, Morphic Systems and Morphic System of Systems (M-SOS). Its applications to the field of computation by words as an example of the Morphic Computing, Morphogenetic Fields in neural network and Morphic Computing, Morphic Fields - concepts and Web search, and agents and fuzzy in Morphic Computing will also be discussed.
Keywords Morphic Computing - Morphogenetic Computing - Morphic Fields - Morphogenetic Fields - Quantum Computing - DNA Computing - Soft Computing - Computing with Words - Morphic Systems - Morphic Neural Network - Morphic System of Systems - Optical Computation by Holograms - Holistic Systems

Morphic Computing

In this paper, we introduce a new type of computation called “Morphic Computing”. Morphic Computing is based on Field Theory and more specifically Morphic Fields. Morphic Fields were first introduced by Rupert Sheldrake [1981] from his hypothesis of formative causation that made use of the older notion of Morphogenetic Fields. In this paper, we introduce the basis for this new computing paradigm.
Keywords Morphic Computing - Morphogenetic Computing - Morphic Fields - Morphogenetic Fields - Quantum Computing - DNA Computing

Любая ли последовательность аминокислот даёт жизнеспособный белок? Тогда любая последовательность триплетов может кодировать белок, то бишь может стать геном. Как тогда отличают участки-гены от таких не-генов?

Учитывае огромое количество соответствующих бубликаций я бы на месте противников Петровича сдался на милость победителя.
А то хуже будет

Блин, ну я просто фегею - каждый день нахожу кучу материалов. И откедова токма энтузязизм берется ? Не могу понять.

А что Вы курите ?

Петр Петрович, обратите внимание на материал в посте 13. По видимому это интересно. Я до сих пор не очень ссылался на Шелдрейка, но эта работа пожалуй первая на которую можно опираться

Как тогда отличают участки-гены от таких не-генов?

Шелдрейк стоИт близко к нам. Но он слишком абстрактен и притом слишком биолог. Мы хотя бы пытаемся нащупать конкретные морфогенетические механизмы, опираясь на физику, но не претендуем на всю природу. Он же видит морфические резонансы на всех уровнях организации материи, включая Живую. Может, прав. Автор пытается математизировать эти идеи, но далек от практики.

Так я ж про это и гундосю: сами работы Шелдрейка я не считаю нужным рассматривать, а вот эти авторы - то что надо

Шелдрейк стоИт близко к нам.

A объяснить, почему Вы так считаете, можете? В формате мини-обзора для ликвидации безграммотности. Чем Вам не нравятся работы Шелдрейка и что такого интересного Вы обнаружили у этих авторов

Эти же авторы четко указывают на квантовую составляющую.